<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lefsetz on &#8220;Bundling&#8221; / Bandcamp on &#8220;Music As Artifact&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christinebougie.com/lefsetz-on-bundling-bandcamp-on-music-as-artifact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christinebougie.com/lefsetz-on-bundling-bandcamp-on-music-as-artifact/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:26:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.christinebougie.com/lefsetz-on-bundling-bandcamp-on-music-as-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinebougie.com/?p=1399#comment-377</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean about the shuffle.  I also have a lot of demos and rough mixes in my computer from recordings I&#039;m working on, so that screws up the whole shuffle thing.   

And I&#039;ve also been enjoying listening to free radio-ish podcasts. It&#039;s true, these are subscription models.  Paying for it seems crazy at this point.

The next few years will be interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean about the shuffle.  I also have a lot of demos and rough mixes in my computer from recordings I&#8217;m working on, so that screws up the whole shuffle thing.   </p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve also been enjoying listening to free radio-ish podcasts. It&#8217;s true, these are subscription models.  Paying for it seems crazy at this point.</p>
<p>The next few years will be interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elena</title>
		<link>http://www.christinebougie.com/lefsetz-on-bundling-bandcamp-on-music-as-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>elena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christinebougie.com/?p=1399#comment-375</guid>
		<description>The &quot;bundling/unbundling&quot; idea is really interesting in the context of content&#039;s relationship to form, and reminds me of a Sufjan Stevens interview I recently read:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.exclaim.ca/articles/generalarticlesynopsfullart.aspx?csid1=123&amp;csid2=844&amp;fid1=41772&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here in Exclaim.&lt;/a&gt;

Specifically this part got me thinking, in relation to your post:
&lt;i&gt;&quot;I feel that the album no longer has a stronghold or has any real bearing anymore. The physical format itself is obsolete; the CD is obsolete and the LP is kinda nostalgic. So, I think the album is suffering and that’s how I’ve always created — I work with these conceptual albums in the long-form. And I’m wondering, what’s the value of my work once these forms are obsolete and everyone’s just downloading music? &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve always been a fan of the complete, start-to-finish album (can&#039;t really deal with shuffle; my eclectic collection makes it a pretty jarring experience), and can&#039;t help wonder the same things. I feel like a music subscription service would be a lot like radio-ish podcasts or genre-divided satellite radio— these have lately been my avenues to try to find new-to-me music. 

So, I think Lefsetz&#039;s idea already exists, which means it may be difficult to get people to pay for (since they&#039;re already used to getting it for free)... it&#039;ll be interesting to watch how well the New York Times pay structure changes go over, and how the music distributors respond to that model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;bundling/unbundling&#8221; idea is really interesting in the context of content&#8217;s relationship to form, and reminds me of a Sufjan Stevens interview I recently read:<br />
<a href="http://www.exclaim.ca/articles/generalarticlesynopsfullart.aspx?csid1=123&amp;csid2=844&amp;fid1=41772" rel="nofollow">here in Exclaim.</a></p>
<p>Specifically this part got me thinking, in relation to your post:<br />
<i>&#8220;I feel that the album no longer has a stronghold or has any real bearing anymore. The physical format itself is obsolete; the CD is obsolete and the LP is kinda nostalgic. So, I think the album is suffering and that’s how I’ve always created — I work with these conceptual albums in the long-form. And I’m wondering, what’s the value of my work once these forms are obsolete and everyone’s just downloading music? &#8220;</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been a fan of the complete, start-to-finish album (can&#8217;t really deal with shuffle; my eclectic collection makes it a pretty jarring experience), and can&#8217;t help wonder the same things. I feel like a music subscription service would be a lot like radio-ish podcasts or genre-divided satellite radio— these have lately been my avenues to try to find new-to-me music. </p>
<p>So, I think Lefsetz&#8217;s idea already exists, which means it may be difficult to get people to pay for (since they&#8217;re already used to getting it for free)&#8230; it&#8217;ll be interesting to watch how well the New York Times pay structure changes go over, and how the music distributors respond to that model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->